Custom Story of an Hour and A Doll’s House Essay Paper Sample
Literature is the finest representation of life conceived only in the imagination of a writer whose character and knowledge has conquered all social limits and he/she sees this society clearer than us. Through a piece of written literary work, the writer invites us to share his views and make changes for the sake of a better future. Like in the novels Pride and Prejudice, and Brave New World the two writers create in their imagination that 'Real Person' and make him/her to play a specific social part where the character steps out of his social personality into his universal individuality. In fact it is this super dimension of the characters that is enthralling and qualifies them as the pointers of social change. These extra-ordinary actions of the characters trigger social change in a manner that is of accurate universality.
In the story of an hour it explores how a woman after her husband's death achieves liberty, finds autonomy and as illuminated by the title of the story she strives to self determination for an hour. Although the story is short it is great it envisions a time when social complacency sets off the chain reaction o attainment of self desire and recognition and with specific use of language she bring to the readers the significance with every single phrase. In this book she has managed to pass the information though very little on the surface about women getting their individual liberty and deciding their personal ways of freedom which was unusual at her time.
Buy Story of an Hour and A Doll’s House essay paper online
* Final order price might be slightly different depending on the current exchange rate of chosen payment system.
The play 'A Doll's House' by Henrik Ibsen capitalizes on a young mother's awareness that her life has been lived a paternalistic setting, passed on to her like a doll, from her father's house to her husband's. That is, being encouraged to be submissive to her male counterparts than speak out her own mind. Her over bearing responsibility at the moment is to instruct herself and come to terms with the world she inhabits before she declared capable enough to bring up her own children. The events in the play make the title 'A Doll's house' appropriate owing to the fact that this play was written at time when male dominance was very inherent and if so to speak, at the family level.
Nora tells Krogstad that she "naturally" doesn't have influence to mean that her sex has placed her in an awkward position. She further admits that that "a man can put a thing like [divorce] straight much easier than a woman" which gives a good example to how culture can hinder the right of self-expression. This is a stereotype that has become fossilized in the modern society, and is well represented by the title since it undermines the key decisive role that a woman should play in a marriage.
Guided by the tile, this play asserts the disparity between men and women however, it represents these differences as psychological and even culturally constructed and not biologically innate. The predicaments of Nora force us to rethink our points of view as far as authority in the family is concerned. And the title provokes the readers thoughts towards the manner in which wives are treated by husbands in their families. The only solution to this family crisis, as the play presents, is the ability for the 'doll' to free itself from this unhappy house and embark on self realization mission.
Kristine, a widow, has had a pill of an unhappy marriage which we learn through their conversation with Nora. When Nora tells her of the loan she tells her that " a wise wife cannot borrow without her husband's consent" but Nora tells her that " if it is a wife who has any head for business- a wife who has the wit to be a little bit clever" will be able to take it.
This is the beginning of realization that drastic measures have to be taken by women to liberate themselves. Nora, the main female character, opts to walk out of her marriage after realizing how unhappy she has been with her husband. This can be attributed to Ibsen's advocacy for individuals' right to affirm their own human dignity and integrity as rational beings their sexes aside.
Ideally in the modern society, females believe that a male-based authority and power structure exists that it is entirely responsible for suppression and inequality. And as long as these systems and their norms remain re-defined or done away with altogether, society will never be reformed in any important way. This means that the 'doll' may not come out of its puppeteer's hand soon. Ibsen is undoubtedly conscious of these forces such as the law, manifested within the acts of Krogstad and Torvald, and the systematic patriarchal order in the society in general. Nora, the Doll under control of Torvald, essentially attempts to revalidate what she considers as undervalued female attributes and qualities.
Nora tells Krogstad that she "naturally" doesn't have influence to mean that her sex has placed her in an awkward position ( Ibsen, 45). She further admits that that "a man can put a thing like [divorce] straight much easier than a woman" which gives a good example to how culture can hinder the right of self-expression ( Ibsen, 70). This is a stereotype that has become fossilized in the modern society, and is well represented by the title since it undermines the key decisive role that a woman should play in a marriage.
Mrs. Linde reveals that her husband took advantage of her situation to lure her to an unhappy marriage when she says that "my mother was alive then and was bedridden and helpless, and I had to provide for my younger brothers; so I did not think I was justified in refusing his offer" ( Ibsen, 20). The truth is that Mrs. Linde's husband took advantage of her situation to lure into marriage and ultimately making her a doll that was prone to his manipulations.
Guided by the title, this play asserts the disparity between men and women however, it represents these differences as psychological and even culturally constructed and not biologically innate. The predicaments of Nora force us to rethink our points of view as far as authority in the family is concerned. And the title provokes the readers thoughts towards the manner in which wives are treated by husbands in their families. The only solution to this family crisis, as the play presents, is the ability for the 'doll' to free itself from this unhappy house and embark on self realization mission.
When Nora leaves her husband for the last time, she does this for reasons other than what she had intended initially. Even before Torvald gets a chance to face her with the letter, Nora is on her way to take away her own life fully convinced that Torvald should have to sacrifice his life for hers. She thinks that her husband will be more than willing to die for her: which according to her makes them equals. She unfortunately gets disappointed when she discovers her husband has no such intentions of trading his life for hers.
Instead of rejecting Krogstad's demands and putting the blame on him, Torvald laments to Nora that she has destroyed his life. Nora asks him if he can give his life for her and Torvald replies that he can never give away his honor in the name of a loved one. Realizing that their marriage cannot hold since there is no (and there can never be) love between them, Nora decides to leave Torvald. She discovers that for her to be a wife, she must first search for herself in the world. She walks out of 'a doll's house' an unformed soul into the world, fully determined to be a great and dignified individual--and no longer a doll to any male in her life.
Earnestly in both cases the reader can follow a red line of each individual characters development and death as an eventuality, as the last possible consequence. In the 19th century there were only two viable options for women, to become an old maid or a married woman the former was regarded to as a failure. A married woman at home was considered to be in a safe haven and a wedding ring regarding vested interest was a considered as gift of inadequacy as well of respectability. A woman as a dual self is pitted against balancing between self will and submission and at most times contradicting herself.
Related comparison-essay essays
- Ford and Toyota
- The Conquest of the Aztec Empire
- Houyhnhnm Land Compared to Today’s Society
- The Ideal University versus the Real University
- The Great Depression and the Great Recession
- Life before Internet versus Life after Intenet
- The Right Nation and Jesus Camp
- Generation Y
- Federal Banking System vs European System
- The Blackberry is Better
Most popular orders