Custom «Developmental Differences in Concurrent and Prospective Relations » Essay Paper Sample
The article was written by Rose et al 2004 and examines the overt aggression and perceived popularity in the developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. The article is peer reviewed. This paper covered children and early adolescents in 2 studies which had 607 and 1049 respondents respectively. The study findings established that youths who are older developed positive concurrent positive relations between overt aggression and perceived popularity. The popularity becomes less important when relation aggression was managed. When evident aggression was controlled there were positive associations between relational aggression and perceived popularity. Younger respondents however did not have positive relation between aggression and perceived popularity.
This marked the first study; the second study examined the temporary ordering of the relations over six months. In the second study the study established that in girls who were older, there was a positive relation between the relational aggression and perceived popularity. The relations were bidirectional. In the study, the older boys showed relational aggression which did not predict perceived popularity that was increased. The study showed that older boys' increased relational aggression was related to perceived popularity.
The research concentrated on the youth who are cast off by their age mates and who engage in behavior that is negative, for instance aggression and who at risk for problems of adjusting. This study was prompted by the fact that most current researches became interested in high status of the youth. This study however made a difference between the two groups of youth who are of high status. There are youth who are well liked by their age mates and are engaged in pro social behavior and those who are viewed by their age mates as popular though they are not liked necessarily. This research proved that most current research needs to tackle wide characteristics of the two groups of popular youth and their consequences and precursors of their development. They should focus on high status and socially powerful aggressors and their influence on peers.